| Title | Lecteurs arabes et latins de Thémistius au Moyen Âge: l’intellect et ses objets |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 3-36 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Themistius, Aquinas, Aristotle, De anima, Intellect |
| Author(s) | Elisa Coda |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle’s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5804","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5804,"authors_free":[{"id":6725,"entry_id":5804,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1738,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Elisa Coda","free_first_name":"Elisa ","free_last_name":"Coda","norm_person":{"id":1738,"first_name":"Elisa","last_name":"Coda","full_name":"Elisa Coda","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1168595843","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Elisa Coda"}}],"entry_title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets"},"abstract":"This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle\u2019s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/rspt.1061.0003","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":1738,"full_name":"Elisa Coda","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5804,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"106","issue":"1","pages":"3-36"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Pomponazzi Contra Averroes on the Intellect |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | British Journal for the History of Philosophy |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45–66 |
| Categories | Renaissance, De anima, Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Themistius, Thomas |
| Author(s) | John Sellars |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper examines Pomponazzi's arguments against Averroes in his De Immortalitate Animae, focusing on the question whether thought is possible without a body. The first part of the paper will sketch the history of the problem, namely the interpretation of Aristotle's remarks about the intellect in De Anima 3.4-5, touching on Alexander, Themistius, and Averroes. The second part will focus on Pomponazzi's response to Averroes, including his use of arguments by Aquinas. It will conclude by suggesting that Pomponazzi's discussion stands as the first properly modern account of Aristotle's psychology. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5255","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5255,"authors_free":[{"id":6064,"entry_id":5255,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"John Sellars","free_first_name":"John","free_last_name":"Sellars","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Pomponazzi Contra Averroes on the Intellect","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pomponazzi Contra Averroes on the Intellect"},"abstract":"This paper examines Pomponazzi's arguments against Averroes in his De Immortalitate Animae, focusing on the question whether thought is possible without a body. The first part of the paper will sketch the history of the problem, namely the interpretation of Aristotle's remarks about the intellect in De Anima 3.4-5, touching on Alexander, Themistius, and Averroes. The second part will focus on Pomponazzi's response to Averroes, including his use of arguments by Aquinas. It will conclude by suggesting that Pomponazzi's discussion stands as the first properly modern account of Aristotle's psychology.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09608788.2015.1063979","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5255,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","volume":"24","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201366"}},"sort":[2016]}
| Title | Lecteurs arabes et latins de Thémistius au Moyen Âge: l’intellect et ses objets |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 3-36 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Themistius, Aquinas, Aristotle, De anima, Intellect |
| Author(s) | Elisa Coda |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle’s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5804","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5804,"authors_free":[{"id":6725,"entry_id":5804,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1738,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Elisa Coda","free_first_name":"Elisa ","free_last_name":"Coda","norm_person":{"id":1738,"first_name":"Elisa","last_name":"Coda","full_name":"Elisa Coda","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1168595843","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Elisa Coda"}}],"entry_title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets"},"abstract":"This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle\u2019s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/rspt.1061.0003","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":1738,"full_name":"Elisa Coda","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5804,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"106","issue":"1","pages":"3-36"}},"sort":["Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets"]}
| Title | Pomponazzi Contra Averroes on the Intellect |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | British Journal for the History of Philosophy |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45–66 |
| Categories | Renaissance, De anima, Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Themistius, Thomas |
| Author(s) | John Sellars |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper examines Pomponazzi's arguments against Averroes in his De Immortalitate Animae, focusing on the question whether thought is possible without a body. The first part of the paper will sketch the history of the problem, namely the interpretation of Aristotle's remarks about the intellect in De Anima 3.4-5, touching on Alexander, Themistius, and Averroes. The second part will focus on Pomponazzi's response to Averroes, including his use of arguments by Aquinas. It will conclude by suggesting that Pomponazzi's discussion stands as the first properly modern account of Aristotle's psychology. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5255","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5255,"authors_free":[{"id":6064,"entry_id":5255,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"John Sellars","free_first_name":"John","free_last_name":"Sellars","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Pomponazzi Contra Averroes on the Intellect","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pomponazzi Contra Averroes on the Intellect"},"abstract":"This paper examines Pomponazzi's arguments against Averroes in his De Immortalitate Animae, focusing on the question whether thought is possible without a body. The first part of the paper will sketch the history of the problem, namely the interpretation of Aristotle's remarks about the intellect in De Anima 3.4-5, touching on Alexander, Themistius, and Averroes. The second part will focus on Pomponazzi's response to Averroes, including his use of arguments by Aquinas. It will conclude by suggesting that Pomponazzi's discussion stands as the first properly modern account of Aristotle's psychology.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09608788.2015.1063979","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5255,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","volume":"24","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201366"}},"sort":["Pomponazzi Contra Averroes on the Intellect"]}